Systems and methods for sensor-enhanced health evaluation

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are discussed for providing sensor enhanced safety, recovery, and activity evaluation systems. Sensors that monitor user activity and behavior are worn by a user and/or placed in the user environment. Data from the sensors are processed to obtain a safety, recovery, and/or activity evaluation. Based on the evaluation, recommendations or adjustments to the terms of an insurance policy covering the user, the user&#39;s employer, or a facility providing health care to the user to accurately reflect the risks associated with the user, employer, and/or facility.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/362,737, filed Jan. 30, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/024,676, filed Feb. 1, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/899,076, filed Feb. 2, 2007. The entire contents of all of these applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many insurance companies are considering offering, or do offer, discounts or variable pricing for automobile insurance based on data collected from vehicle telematics. Safety in the workplace includes perils beyond driving, including environmental conditions, physical stress and strain, and dangerous equipment. Sensors on the marketplace and in development can identify dangerous scenarios, including environmental conditions, worker behaviors, use or lack of use of proper safety equipment, and interactions with dangerous machines, substances or areas.

Workers' compensation insurance provides compensation for workers that are injured on the job. This compensation may include medical expenses, death benefits, and payments in lieu of lost wages. Workers' compensation insurance is state-mandated for most employees and is generally provided by private insurance companies, though some states operate a state fund.

Rates for workers' compensation insurance are set by state and are based on industry and job classification. Workers' compensation rating starts with a base rate, derived for each of some 600 classifications. This base rate is not modified for the smallest businesses, but for others, it is. These modifications include a mandatory application of an experience rating credit or debit, depending on a business's claims history compared to the average in that business class. Also, discretionary pricing modifications can be applied by the carrier depending on its underwriting evaluation of the account. Many large accounts share in the funding of their claims via large deductibles, policyholder dividends and retrospectively rated programs. These kinds of programs are generally referred to as “risk share” plans. For those businesses that are subject to experience rating or a “risk share” plan, their net cost of workers' compensation insurance is decreased to the extent they can either prevent, or mitigate the value of, claims.

Most insurance carriers that sell workers' compensation insurance provide professional services that help businesses prevent or mitigate the values of claims, primarily by reviewing the business's exposures and current controls, and by assessing the causes of prior claims and subsequently recommending and implementing solutions. Again, to the extent that these solutions reduce the number and dollar amount of claims, overall, the premium paid by the business will also be reduced. Loss control services are generally available to all businesses, but are most cost-effective for larger businesses.

Typically, loss control services are part of the basic product sold by an insurance carrier. However, loss control services may be made more effective and efficient by appropriately utilizing technology. In particular, sensor technologies that allow insured businesses to quickly identify unsafe situations, thereby providing the businesses with opportunity to correct them, and technologies that give insurance carriers automatic feedback and information on the safety performance of their policyholders, may beneficially contribute to a streamlined workers' compensation insurance evaluation system and advantageously decrease the risk of accidents in the workplace. In addition to streamlining workers' compensation insurance evaluation systems, sensor technologies may assist in improving risk evaluation and loss control for other types of insurance, such as group, short or long-term disability insurance, professional or general liability insurance, and/or medical malpractice insurance. These sensor technologies may also be used to monitor and facilitate other aspects of insured entities, such as general employee health, post-injury return-to-work programs for injured employees, the activity levels of patients in a healthcare facility.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, in one aspect the invention relates to an activity evaluation system for use in managing an insurance-related process. The system comprises at least one sensor, an activity evaluation module, an output device, and a communications module. The sensor(s) are configured to monitor the activity level of an individual associated with an insured entity. The activity evaluation module is configured to collect data from the sensor(s), analyze the data to determine an activity evaluation indicative of the activity level of the individual, and output the activity evaluation. The output device is configured to provide feedback to the individual based at least in part on the activity evaluation. The communications module is configured to communicate the collected data and/or the activity evaluation to a server operated by an insurance company insuring the entity.

In some embodiments, the system includes a business logic processor configured to adjust an insurance-related parameter associated with the entity based on the collected data and/or the activity evaluation. The insurance-related parameter may include a term of an insurance policy, and the term may include a premium, a deductible, a limit, services associated with the insurance policy, costs of the services, rating plan parameters, and/or dividend plan parameters. Optionally, the business logic processor is configured to adjust a renewal decision of an insurance policy covering the insured entity based on the collected data and/or the activity evaluation.

In certain embodiments, the sensor(s) are worn by the individual, and is configured to provide a notification if the sensor(s) are removed from the individual. The output device may provide real-time feedback, including visual, audio, and/or tactile stimulus, to the individual and/or the insured entity. In some embodiments, the individual is an employee of the insured entity, the sensor(s) are worn by the employee, and the activity evaluation data is partially representative of the physical activity of the employee. In some embodiments, the individual is an elderly person wearing the sensor(s). and the activity evaluation data is partially representative of the physical activity of the elderly person.

In another aspect, the invention relates to an activity evaluation system for use in managing an insurance-related process. The system includes a server and a business logic processor. The server is configured to receive activity evaluation data derived at least in part from sensor(s) monitoring the activity of an individual associated with an insured entity. The business logic processor is configured to adjust an insurance-related parameter associated with the insured entity based at least in part on an analysis of the received data by an activity evaluation module.

In some embodiments, the analysis of the received data includes calculating a correlation between the data and an insurance risk. In certain embodiments, adjusting an insurance-related parameter includes adjusting a premium, a deductible, a limit, services associated with an insurance policy, costs of the services, rating plan parameters, and/or dividend plan parameters. Optionally, adjusting an insurance-related parameter includes adjusting a renewal decision of an insurance policy covering the insured entity.

In certain embodiments, the individual is an employee of the insured entity, wears the sensor(s), and the activity evaluation data is partially representative of the physical activity of the employee. In some embodiments, the individual is an elderly person wearing the sensor(s), and the activity evaluation data is partially representative of the physical activity of the elderly person.

In other aspects, the invention relates to methods for using and implementing the system described above.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system suitable for monitoring, evaluating, and providing feedback on employee workplace safety, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a computer network system that may be used in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a first employee safety evaluation system, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a second employee safety evaluation system, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a patient monitoring and evaluation system, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 6A-D depict various views of a wearable sensor, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for evaluating employee workplace safety, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 is a flowchart depicting a process for providing recommendations and/or insurance adjustments based on collected sensor data, according to an embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of the terms of an insurance policy.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To provide an overall understanding of the invention, certain illustrative embodiments will now be described. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the methods described herein may be adapted and modified as is appropriate for the application being addressed and that the systems and methods described herein may be employed in other suitable applications, and that such other additions and modifications will not depart from the scope hereof.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system 100 for monitoring, evaluating, and providing feedback on employee workplace safety at an insured entity. In FIG. 1, insurance company 120 provides customer 101 with insurance coverage. The type of insurance provided by insurance company 120 may be any type of insurance, such as group, short or long-term disability insurance, professional or general liability insurance, medical malpractice insurance, and/or workers' compensation insurance. Customer 101 employs one or more employees 111. Employees 111 work at a workplace environment 109 that is affiliated with customer 101. Workplace environment 109 may include one or more facilities located together or separately from each other. Workplace environment 109 may not be at a fixed location, such as when customer 101 is a contractor who travels to various locations for work. Insurance company 120 can simultaneously provide services to multiple customers, although only one customer 101 is shown in FIG. 1 for clarity.

While on the job, employees 111 may have accidents or develop chronic ailments as a result of handling various types of hazardous machinery 113, equipment 115, and objects 125. A hazardous object 125 may be, for example, a heavy box of merchandise that employees 111 must lift. Hazardous object 125 can also be inherently dangerous, such as a radioactive or chemically toxic object. A few examples of hazardous machinery 113 and equipment 115 include cutting tools, electrical devices, and construction equipment. In addition, workplace environment 109 can be detrimental to the safety of employees 111 if it is prone to fires, breakdowns in proper ventilation, and other lapses in hazard containment.

To monitor the safety of employees 111 as they interact with the workplace, sensors 123 are established in various manners at workplace 109. Sensors 123 can be worn or carried around by employees 111, located on machinery 113, equipment 115, objects 125, and distributed around workplace environment 109. Sensors 123 are configured to take a variety of measurements. For example, motion detectors worn by employees 111 measure body motion as employees 111 move around and carry out various tasks at work. Multiple motion sensors may be worn on different body parts to obtain detailed body movement information. Motion sensors such as accelerometers and/or gyroscopes may monitor speed, acceleration, position, rotation, and other characteristics of body and appendage motion. There are sensors available for determining the body posture of employees 111, particularly while lifting heavy objects. Chronic and acute back injuries are often the result of lifting objects using an improper lifting behavior, and can lead to high valued workers' compensation claims. Pressure sensors embedded in the footwear of employees 111 or located on the floor of workplace 109 also provide information on the ergonomics of employees 111, such the weight and weight distribution over different parts of the body. Many other types of wearable sensors used to gain information about the work habits of employees 111 can be integrated into safety evaluation system 100, such as chemical sensor and location sensors such as GPS transceivers, assisted GPS sensors and/or magnetometers.

In some embodiments, sensors 123 are used to monitor the movement or activity levels of employees 111 who may not generally work with heavy equipment or machinery. For example, sensors 123 may be used to monitor the movements and/or activity levels of employees 111 such as office workers engaged in desk and/or computer work. These employees may tend to be more sedentary than employees that work with other equipment, machinery, or materials. It has been suggested that daily activity of workers may be directly related to their overall health and wellness. Monitoring the activity levels of workers, especially sedentary workers, provides additional information relevant to evaluating the overall risk of an insurance account to calculate insurance premiums and potential discounts. Sensors that can be used to monitor employee activity levels include physiological sensors such as heart rate sensors, blood pressure sensors, pedometers, or other sensors for sensing physiological signals.

In certain embodiments, the activity levels and/or lifting behavior of injured employees are monitored with sensors 123. Workers in manual material handling jobs who become injured may have limited capabilities during their recovery, at which time they may be able to return to work, but not at full capacity. Sensors 123, which may be worn by an injured employee, may be used by occupational health case workers to monitor the activity level of the injured employee during their recovery in order to facilitate the speed of recovery.

In addition to being worn or carried around by employees 111, sensors 123 are also be fixed on machinery 113, equipment 115, and objects 125. These sensors can also be motion, weight, heat, and pressure sensors, like the wearable sensors discussed above. For example, weight/force sensors may be used to measure the weights of objects 125. Heat sensors provide information on the functionality of machinery 113 and equipment 115. Overheating or malfunctioning equipment/machinery constitute a workplace hazard for employees 111. RFID transponders placed on machinery 113, equipment 115, and objects 125 are used to identify the machinery/equipment/object, or if paired with RFID transponders carried by employees 111, are used to determine the relative location of employees 111 with respect to various pieces of machinery 113, equipment 115, or objects 125.

Sensors 123 that are distributed at fixed locations around workplace 109 include heat sensors that monitor the temperature of the workplace. Digital cameras and camcorders can be mounted around workplace 109 to monitor and analyze employee actions, including lifting behavior when lifting heavy objects. The above described sensors and their purposes are discussed in more detail below in connection with the systems depicted in FIGS. 3 and 4.

Sensors 123 can be configured to transmit data continuously throughout the day, at or during specified periods of time, or in response to the detection of a particular event. Data from sensors 123 are collected and stored on local computer 133. Local computer 133 is a computer, a memory device, or a network of such devices that is capable of collecting, storing, and processing sensor data. Local computer 133 may be a mobile device, such as a smart phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), laptop, or micro PC. Alternatively, local computing device 133 may be an embedded computing platform built into sensors 123. Sensors 123 communicate with local computer 133 via communication system 106. Communications system 106 can be wired or wireless, and can utilize any appropriate protocol, such as Bluetooth®, WiFi, ZigBee, or ANT. The internal communication network 106 between sensors 123 and local computer 133 is part of a larger communications network 127 that allows communication of information between customer 101, insurance company 120, and third party provider 107, whose functions are described further below. The devices connected to communication network 127, and the internal networks contained within, may employ data encryption and security software so that sensitive information, such as the medical histories of employees 111, are protected.

In addition to the data obtained from sensors 123, static data regarding employees 111, such as the age, height, level of physical fitness of each person, and data regarding industry safety standards is stored at an internal database 129 at customer 101. Data in internal database 129 supplements sensor data and is transmitted along with sensor data to insurance company 120 for processing. Internal database 129 may not necessarily be located at customer 101. It can be located or maintained at a remote location, but accessible by customer 101 and/or insurance company 120.

Safety data obtained from sensors 123 and database 129 is transmitted via communications network 127 to insurance company 120 for evaluation. In one implementation, the data is transmitted in raw form directly from the sensors. In another implementation, the data is first processed by local computer 133 and then transmitted to insurance company 120 in synthesized form. The transmitted data may also pass through a third party provider 107. In one scenario, third party provider 107 is an outside expert hired by customer 101 or insurance company 120 to perform the analysis and evaluation of the sensor data. In another scenario, insurance company 120 purchases or obtains in another manner data from third party provider 107 instead of interacting directly with customer 101. Like local database 129, third party provider 107 can also be a source of information on industry safety standards, for example from NIOSH and OSHA.

Insurance company 120 has a computer system 119 that includes application servers 102, load balancing proxy servers 103, data storage unit 104, business logic computer 122, and user interface module 105 to perform risk evaluation and underwriting based on the collected employee safety data. Employees of the insurance company 120 and other authorized personnel use user interface module 105 to access the insurance company computer system. User interface module 105 may be any type of computing device that is configured to communicate with other computer systems. User interface module 105 may be connected directly to application server 102, or may access an application server 102 via the load balancing proxy servers 103. User interface module 105 may connect to load balancing proxy servers 103 via a local area network, a private data link, or via the internet. Although depicted as being part of insurance company 120 in FIG. 1, user interface module 105 may be located remotely, such as onsite at an insured facility. The business logic computer 122 is connected to the data storage unit 104 and application servers 102 over a local area network 121, which may be part of communication system 127. In addition, other network infrastructure, including, for example a firewall, backup servers, and back up data stores, may also be included in the system 119, without departing from the scope of the invention. Communications over the local area network 121 and/or over the Internet, in one implementation, are encrypted. In addition, such communications, whether encrypted or not, may also be digitally signed for authenticating the source of the communications. The computer system 119 may also include a certificate authority to authenticate one or more of the communications using public key infrastructure.

Based on employee safety data collected from the various sources described above, a safety evaluation module analyzes and evaluates employee safety of customer 101. As used herein, a “module” is a processor or portion of a processor configured to perform one or more functions. In some embodiments, the module includes hardware and software executing on the hardware for performing particular functions. Optionally, the module includes hardware specifically designed to perform particular functions, or includes hardware and firmware specifically configured to perform particular functions. In some embodiments, a module includes executable code that, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables in a module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the software portion of the module and achieve, along with hardware, the stated purpose for the module.

Indeed, a module of executable code could include a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network. In addition, entire modules, or portions thereof, may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like or as hardwired integrated circuits.

In one implementation, the safety evaluation module is implemented in business logic computer 122. In other implementations, the safety evaluation module is implemented in application servers 102, on local computer 133, or is distributed across multiple elements of system 119. After the safety evaluation module evaluates the safety condition of customer 101, it sends feedback back to customer 101 via communications network 127 that is directed towards improving employee workplace safety. Feedback is provided to employees 111 through a visual, audio, or tactile stimulus, which is represented by flashing lights 130 in FIG. 1. Flashing lights 130 may, for example, flash when an employee 111 enters into a hazardous area or adopts an unsafe posture when lifting heavy object 125. Other types of feedback mechanisms include a vibrating device worn by employee 111 or an audio buzzer. Feedback may also be given to a manager, and then relayed to employee 111 in an indirect manner, such as in a verbal conversation between the manager and employee 111.

A business logic module, implemented preferably in business logic computer 122, is used to underwrite or alter workers' compensation insurance pricing for customer 101 based on the received data. The business logic module may use predictive models, such as neural networks, Bayesian networks, and support vector machines, in performing the underwriting and premium adjustment. In one embodiment, the premium of the insurance policy is decreased if customer 101 employees exhibit safe practices. Conversely, insurance premiums are increased in response to unsafe employee performance. Instead of altering premium rates, other terms of the insurance policy can be altered, such as the policy deductible.

In another scenario, insurance company 120 awards customer 101 with premium discounts, or other advantageous rewards, simply for instituting a safety evaluation and feedback system. In this scenario, insurance company 120 does not receive actual safety data from customer 101. Insurance company 120 may award different discounts depending on policies instituted by customer 101 based on the output of the safety evaluation and feedback system. For example, insurance company 120 may award a discount if customer 101 has a safety policy of giving salary bonuses to employees 111 with good safety records. Insurance company 120 may also award a discount if customer 101 has a reward policy that promotes active participation of employees 111 in the safety evaluation system. These scenarios are described in more detail further below in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4.

Business logic computer 122 may be implemented based on the computer network system architecture shown in FIG. 2. Business logic computer 122 may have data storage capabilities of its own, or may access external data storage unit 104 for such purposes. In one implementation, data storage unit 104 is a data warehouse utilized by the insurance company 120. The data warehouse is the main electronic depository of the insurance company's current and historical data. The data warehouse includes one or more interrelated databases that store information relevant to insurance data analysis. The interrelated databases store both structured and unstructured data. In one implementation, one or more of the interrelated databases store electronic copies of insurance forms, either in an image format or a text-searchable format keyed to a customer or claim. Other databases in the interrelated databases store data, for example, in a relational database, in various data fields keyed to various identifiers, such as, without limitation, customer, data source, geography, or business identifier (such as Standard Industry Classification Code). The information stored in the data warehouse 104 is obtained through communications with customers, agents, vendors, sensors, and third party data providers and investigators. In particular, the data warehouse is configured to store data about customer employee safety, as well as related loss information, if any. Preferably, the computations required for risk evaluation and underwriting are primarily carried out by business logic computer 122, in order to free up the other resources for other tasks. The processes performed by business logic computer 122 in illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below in relation to FIGS. 3 and 4.

In one implementation, software operating on the application servers 102 act merely as presentation and data extraction and conversion servers. All substantive business logic, including underwriting and pricing determinations, is carried out on the business logic computer 122. In this implementation, the application servers 102 obtain data from the data storage unit 104 and the business logic computer 122 and incorporate that data into web pages (or other graphical user interface formats). These web pages are then communicated by the application servers 102 through the load balancing proxy servers 103 to user interface module 105 for presentation. Upon receiving input from user interface module 105, the application server 102 translates the input into a form suitable for processing by the business logic computer 122 and for storage by the data storage unit 104. In this implementation, the application servers can be operated by third parties, who can add their own branding to the web pages or add other customized presentation data. In the alternative, at least some of the business logic is also carried out by the application servers 102. Application servers 102 may also include a webserver for automatically recovering or retrieving safety data from local computer 133.

In another implementation, the application servers 102 are software modules operating on one or more computers. One of the computers on which the application servers 102 are operating may also serve as the business logic computer 122 and/or as a load balancing proxy server 103.

In other implementations, the software operating on user interface module 105 includes a thin or thick client application in addition to, or instead of web browser. The thin or thick client application interfaces with a corresponding server application operating on the application server 102.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a computing architecture suitable for implementing various ones of the computing devices depicted in FIG. 1, including, for example, the business logic computer 122, application servers 102, and user interface module 105.

Computer 201 comprises at least one central processing unit (CPU) 202, at least one read-only memory (ROM) 203, at least one communication port or hub 204, at least one random access memory (RAM) 205, and one or more databases or data storage devices 206. All of these later elements are in communication with the CPU 202 to facilitate the operation of the computer 201. The computer 201 may be configured in many different ways. For example, computer 201 may be a conventional standalone computer or alternatively, the function of computer 201 may be distributed across multiple computing systems and architectures.

Computer 201 may be configured in a distributed architecture, wherein databases and processors are housed in separate units or locations. Some such units perform primary processing functions and contain at a minimum, a general controller or a processor 202, a ROM 203, and a RAM 205. In such an embodiment, each of these units is attached to a communications hub or port 204 that serves as a primary communication link with other servers 207, client or user computers 208 and other related devices 209. The communications hub or port 204 may have minimal processing capability itself, serving primarily as a communications router. A variety of communications protocols may be part of the system, including but not limited to: Ethernet, SAP, SAS™, ATP, BLUETOOTH™, GSM, ZipBee, ANT, and TCP/IP.

The CPU 202 comprises a processor, such as one or more conventional microprocessors and one or more supplementary co-processors such as math co-processors. The CPU 202 is in communication with the communication port 204 through which the CPU 202 communicates with other devices such as other servers 207, user terminals 208, or devices 209. The communication port 204 may include multiple communication channels for simultaneous communication with, for example, other processors, servers or client terminals. Devices in communication with each other need not be continually transmitting to each other. On the contrary, such devices need only transmit to each other as necessary, may actually refrain from exchanging data most of the time, and may require several steps to be performed to establish a communication link between the devices.

The CPU 202 is also in communication with the data storage device 206. The data storage device 206 comprises an appropriate combination of magnetic, optical and/or semiconductor memory, and may include, for example, RAM, ROM, flash drive, an optical disc such as a compact disc and/or a hard disk or drive. The CPU 202 and the data storage device 206 each may be, for example, located entirely within a single computer or other computing device; or connected to each other by a communication medium, such as a USB port, serial port cable, a coaxial cable, a Ethernet type cable, a telephone line, a radio frequency transceiver or other similar wireless or wired medium or combination of the foregoing. For example, the CPU 202 may be connected to the data storage device 206 via the communication port 204.

The data storage device 206 may store, for example, (i) a program (e.g., computer program code and/or a computer program product) adapted to direct the CPU 202 in accordance with the present invention, and particularly in accordance with the processes described in detail hereinafter with regard to the CPU 202; (ii) databases adapted to store information that are utilized to store information required by the program. Suitable databases include data storage unit 104 of FIG. 1.

The program may be stored, for example, in a compressed, an uncompiled and/or an encrypted format, and include computer program code. The instructions of the program may be read into a main memory of the processor from a computer-readable medium other than the data storage device 206, such as from a ROM 203 or from a RAM 205. While execution of sequences of instructions in the program causes the processor 202 to perform the process steps described herein, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of, or in combination with, software instructions for implementation of the processes of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.

Suitable computer program code may be provided for performing numerous functions such as safety data processing and insurance policy underwriting. The program also may include program elements such as an operating system, a database management system and “device drivers” that allow the processor to interface with computer peripheral devices 209 (e.g., a video display, a keyboard, a computer mouse, etc.).

The term “computer-readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that provides or participates in providing instructions to the processor of the computing device (or any other processor of a device described herein) for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media and volatile media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical, magnetic, or opto-magnetic disks, such as memory. Volatile media include dynamic random access memory (DRAM), which typically constitutes the main memory. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM or EEPROM (electronically erasable programmable read-only memory), a FLASH-EEPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other medium from which a computer can read.

Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to the processor 202 (or any other processor of a device described herein) for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be borne on a magnetic disk of a remote computer 208. The remote computer 208 can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over an Ethernet connection, cable line, or even telephone line using a modem. A communications device 204 local to a computing device (or, e.g., a server) can receive the data on the respective communications line and place the data on a system bus for the processor. The system bus carries the data to main memory, from which the processor retrieves and executes the instructions. Optionally, the instructions received by main memory are stored in memory either before or after execution by the processor. In addition, instructions may be received via a communication port as electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals, which are exemplary forms of wireless communications or data streams that carry various types of information.

As previously discussed with reference to FIG. 1, servers may also interact and/or control one or more user devices 209, such as displays and printers, or remote computers 208 such as, e.g., user interface module 105. User device 209 may include any one or a combination of a personal computer, a laptop, a personal digital assistant, a mouse, a keyboard, a computer display, a touch screen, LCD, voice recognition software, or other generally represented by input/output devices required to implement the above functionality.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative employee safety monitoring and evaluation system where customer 101 is insured by insurance company 120. In FIG. 3, employee 302 of customer 101 is lifting a heavy object 312. This system is configured to monitor the likelihood of stress and strain injuries, which constitute a large potion of workers' compensation claims. As a participant of a safety evaluation system, employee 302 wears sensors 304 on his body to monitor his body posture, movement, and other lifting behavior while lifting object 312. Sensors 304 may be, for example, footwear with embedded weight/force sensors that measure his weight distribution, heat sensors to monitor overheating or overexertion, and digital cameras to capture lifting behavior information.

As employee 302 performs the task of lifting object 312, the above described sensors transmit data to computing device 306. In one embodiment, computing device 306 is a mobile computing device, such as a smart phone, laptop, micro PC, or an embedded computing platform built into the sensor platform. Data is transferred between sensors 304 and computing device 306 via any kind of wireless communication system, such as a Bluetooth® or WiFi network. Computing device 306 collects, aggregates, and stores the transmitted data. Computing device 306 also performs calculations and analyses on the transmitted data, such as noise filtering and mathematical operations to synthesize more meaningful data.

In addition to data derived from sensors, static data is also available and stored in database 308. Static data includes data such as the name, medical history, job characteristics, and other personal facts regarding employee 302. Static data also includes the weight, attachment points, and dimensions of object 312. This type of data is used by computing device 306 in conjunction with sensor data to evaluate the safety of employee actions. For example, it could be considered unsafe for an employee weighing 110 lbs and in poor physical shape to lift a 50 lbs object, while a different employee weighing 150 lbs and in good shape could do the same task safely. Static data stored in database 308 optionally includes industry safety standards set by NIOSH and OSHA. These industry standards are used in some implementations as a benchmark for safety evaluation. In some embodiments, the safety evaluation results in a lifting safety indicator that insurance company 120 uses in altering the policy terms.

Computing device 306 provides employee 302 with immediate feedback about his lifting behavior through a stimulus. For example, a light may blink whenever employee 302 adopts unsafe lifting behavior. Alternatively, a vibrating apparatus worn by employee 302 or an audio stimulus is activated to relay the same message. In one implementation, feedback stimuli is activated by computing device 306 only when employee actions pass a certain quantitative threshold. To obtain a safety evaluation score to compare to the threshold, computing device 306 applies a quantitative algorithm to the received data.

In addition to computing device 306, which may be a handheld mobile device and insufficient for all the computing and storage needs of the evaluation system, there may be a local server 310 connected to computing device 306. Local server 310 communicates directly with database 308 and sensors 304. Data may be transferred between local server 310 and the other elements of the system via a USB, wired LAN, WiFi, or cellular connection. The network connection is preferentially secure so that personal data such as employee medical history is protected. Local server 310 performs local processing such as collecting raw sensor data over time and aggregating information for analysis across all users of the safety evaluation system. Local server 310 can be located onsite at customer 101 or be a product or service offered by a third party.

In one implementation, local server 310 generates periodic safety reports on all the employees 302 for management of customer 101. Management can then use these reports to provide feedback to employees 302 to promote safer behavior. These reports may also be used by management to create policies that promote safe behavior. For example, the fraction of safe to unsafe lifts performed by an employee 302 or other lifting safety indicators can be included in the report, and management may award employee 302 a year-end bonus or other benefit or recognition based on this indicator.

In some embodiments, local server 310, computing device 306, database 308, and sensors 304 also transmit data directly to insurance company 120. Data transmission between these elements and insurance company 120 may occur in a variety of ways, such as via secure email, HTTPS protocol, and XML messages over a SOAP protocol. Insurance company 120 may use this data for safety and premium analysis.

Safety analysis includes any safety assessment, risk evaluation, or risk improvement services. Services offered may include loss control services such as the dispatch of safety experts employed by insurance company 120 to advise on dangerous scenarios at the workplace. Loss control services may be provided, for example, after insurance company 120 is alerted of unsafe circumstances at a customer workplace through reports sent from local server 310. Modification of these services based on the received data may include an increase or decrease in frequency of the service, a change in the cost of the service, and targeting a specific safety concern.

Premium analysis includes activities that potentially affect a customer's premium, deductible amount, discounts or credits, as well as large scale analysis to provide input into industry or occupation experience factors. The determination of premium and offering of discounts or credits may be performed once at underwriting time, regularly on an interval, continuously, in response to an event, or retroactively, as permitted by local, state, and/or federal regulations.

The analysis and decisions made by insurance company 120 with regard to premium/service adjustments and safety evaluation may be transmitted back to customer 101. This information may be stored at local server 310, or on another device at customer 101. This information may be directly accessible by employees 302 of customer 101 or may be relayed to employees 302 by manager 314.

Insurance company 120 may save the data and reports received from customer 101, and the decisions that were made based upon them, in data storage unit 104, which was discussed in FIG. 1, or in a separate data warehouse. This archived data may be used for future retrospective analysis, claims adjudication, and/or to support fraud investigation.

Another illustrative employee safety monitoring and evaluation system is shown in FIG. 4. Other major sources of peril in the workplace include lack of compliance with best practices for use of personal protective equipment and other guidelines regarding off-limits hazardous areas and permission to use dangerous equipment. For example, it is well understood that safety goggles should be used when operating certain machinery, such as a lathe. The system shown in FIG. 4 may be used to monitor and promote compliance with such guidelines, and appropriately alter insurance policy terms in response to changes in compliance.

Like in FIG. 3, customer 101 employing employees 402, is insured by insurance company 120. Employee 402 may perform a job that requires protective clothing or equipment 404, such as hard hats, goggles, gloves, boots, and lifting belts. For example, employee 402 may be a lathe operator. While it is in the employee's best interest to wear protective clothing 404 and customer 101 may have policies requiring protective clothing, employee 402 may intentionally or unintentionally fail to comply with these policies. A safety monitoring system can promote compliance and lead to fewer injuries at the workplace.

In the system depicted in FIG. 4, articles of personal protective equipment 404 are tagged with inexpensive RFID chips. The hazardous equipment 406 that employee 402 operates is equipped with sensors, such as an RFID reader for detecting the presence of personal protective equipment. Examples of hazardous equipment include hand tools, power tools, machine tools, construction equipment and vehicles, and chemically toxic and physically fragile objects. A motion detector, such as an infrared motion sensor, may also be located on or near equipment 406. The motion detector may have a range of less than a few meters, so that it senses only motion very close to it. When employee 402 approaches equipment 406, the motion detector is activated, triggering the RFID reader. The RFID reader detects the RFID tagged personal protective equipment 404, or lack thereof, and recognizes the employee 402. Employee identity information may be stored in the RFID chip if the protective clothing is not shared. Otherwise, a separate RFID chip may be embedded in employee 402's ID card or in another convenient object.

In one implementation, equipment 406 is configured to stay inactive unless RFID tagged personal protective equipment is detected. Thus, employee 402 cannot operate equipment 406 without wearing appropriate personal protective equipment 404. In another implementation, an employee's presence in the vicinity of equipment 406 without personal protective equipment 404 may trigger an alarm. For example, if an employee activates the motion detector, but the RFID scanner does not detect a corresponding chip, then an alarm will sound to alert the employee that he is not wearing personal protective equipment 404. The alarm may also be concurrently transmitted to employee 402's supervisor and medical personnel in some situations, such as when employee 402 approaches chemically toxic or radioactive equipment 406 without a radiation suit.

The system can log the number of times employee 402 attempts to handle or operate equipment 406 without proper personal protective equipment 404. This information can be used by insurance company 120 to evaluate the safety of employee 402's behavior. The results of the evaluation can be used by insurance company 120 to alter the terms of the insurance policy.

Although the system above is described as being implemented using RFID technology, other types of technology may also be used to accomplish the same goals. One example is digital photography and image analysis, which can be used to identify employee 402 and personal protective equipment 404. GPS, assisted GPS, floor pressure sensors, and motion detectors are other technologies that can be utilized, alone or in combination, to implement the above described safety monitoring and alert system. In addition, sensors can be combined into sensor networks and incorporated into the system.

Another scenario where the above described monitoring and alert system may be utilized is in monitoring employee 402 activity and presence in hazardous areas at a workplace. Hazardous area 408 may be the vicinity around high voltage electrical equipment, radioactive or chemically toxic areas, areas with dangerous moving parts such as engine rooms, and other places with high likelihood of accidents. In general, customer 101 may want to dissuade employees 402 from entering hazardous areas 408 unless they have a reason to be there and are trained in any special skills that may be necessary.

One method for monitoring activity in hazardous areas 408 is to establish RFID tagged gates around the areas. In this manner, only employees 402 granted with access may enter such areas. In some cases, it might not be desirable to institute such strict requirements around some hazardous areas 408. For example, customer 101 may want to dissuade employees 402 from entering a moderately dangerous work zone, but does not want to implement a more complex system to prevent it. In this case, RFID scanners located at the work zone identify and keep track of the number of times employee 402 enters the zone, but do not actively prevent it. However, by logging the number of times employee 402 enters the zone, feedback can be given to that employee to promote safer behavior in the future. For example, employee 402's manager may have access to the logs and may notify employee 402 verbally.

Other sensors can also be used in addition to, or in place of, RFID tags to implement the system described above. For example, GPS systems can be used to track employee locations and digital photography and photo recognition systems can be used for personnel identification.

Hazardous areas 408 may be equipped with environmental sensors that monitor heat, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and smoke levels. These sensors may be linked to alarms so that immediate feedback and evacuation can be facilitated.

Similar to the embodiment described in FIG. 3, data from sensors located on employees 402, personal protective equipment 404, hazardous equipment 406, and hazardous areas 408 may be transmitted to a local computer 416 for collection, aggregation, and processing. The data may be transmitted via any appropriate wired or wireless, secure or open, communications protocol, as discussed previously in FIG. 3. Local computer 416 may process the sensor data to obtain useful information, such as image analysis on digital camera footage. Local computer 416 may also receive input from database 414, which stores static data regarding the employees 402, personal protective equipment 404, hazardous equipment 406, and hazardous areas 408, such as employee identity, employee access rights to certain areas, employee training level for certain tasks and equipment, and safety information on hazardous equipment 406 owned by customer 101. Local computer 416 may be operated by customer 101 or may be a service/product that is offered by a third party.

Based on the collected sensor data and static information from database 414, local computer 416 may determine the number of times a particular employee 402 fails to comply with safety standards, and generate an a safety evaluation of customer 101's workplace. Local computer 416 may also aggregate safety data across all employees and generate reports for management 410.

Raw data from sensors 404 and processed data from local computer 416 may be transmitted to insurance company 120. Insurance company 120 may perform safety analysis and premium analysis on the data, as discussed above in connection with FIG. 3.

The analysis and decisions made by insurance company 120 with regard to premium/service adjustments and safety evaluation may be transmitted back to customer 101. This information can be stored at local computer 416, or on another device at customer 101. This information may be directly accessible by employees 402 of customer 101 or may be relayed to employees 402 by manager 410.

Insurance company 120 may save the data and reports received from customer 101, and the decisions that were made based upon them, in data storage unit 104, which was discussed in FIG. 1, or in a separate data warehouse. This archived data may be used for future retrospective analysis, claims adjudication, and/or to support fraud investigation.

The embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate exemplary implementations of a safety monitoring and evaluation system. These implementations can also be used in combination to concurrently monitor physical actions performed by employees, personal protective equipment use, and other safety-related behaviors.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative patient monitoring and evaluation system 500, according to one embodiment of the invention. System 500 is similar to system 100 described in FIG. 1, with many of the elements described in system 100, except that system 500 is directed to a healthcare facility 502, such as a hospital, nursing home, assisted-living facility, long or short-term rehabilitation hospital, or other facility providing health care. The insurance company 120 in FIG. 5 provides insurance to the healthcare facility 502 and/or to a patient 504 receiving treatment in the healthcare facility 502. The patient 504 wears sensors 123 for monitoring his or her body movements and activity. For example, the patient 504 may wear sensors 123 around his or her waist. In some embodiments, other sensors not worn by the patient may also be disposed to monitor patient movements and activity. For example, video cameras or motion detectors may be mounted within the patient's room, or upon the patient's bed. Sensor data is collected upon the detection of movement or activity, and may be compiled periodically to provide a movement/activity score or level. For example, sensor data may be compiled in a particular time interval, such as eight hours, to compute a movement score for that time interval.

In certain embodiments, the system 500 may be used to monitor a patient's recovery or rehabilitation progress. For example, the monitored movement/activity metrics of the patient 504 can be used to determine whether the patient 504 is recovering at a sufficient pace, or whether additional care should be provided. For example, if patient 504 suffered from a broken limb, the movement/activity metrics of the patient 504, including movement of his entire body and/or the affected limb, may be used to determine if the limb is moving too much, not enough, and/or whether the patient 504 is performing prescribed rehabilitation exercises at the appropriate times. In some embodiments, the monitored movement/activity metrics of the patient 504 is compared to an expected rehabilitation timeline or schedule. If the monitored metrics do not meet the timeline or schedule, additional care or treatment may be provided to the patient 504.

In some embodiments, the system 500 includes a user terminal 508 configured to allow health care staff and/or third-party monitoring personnel such as case workers to input prescribed motion/activity guidelines and/or rehabilitation timelines/schedules, such as the expected recovery progress of an injury or physical therapy for rehabilitation. User terminal 508 may also be configured to allow personnel to monitor the movement/activity of patient 504 and whether the patient and/or health care staff are following the prescribed m guidelines, and/or to provide reports or summaries of the movement/activity history for patient 504. In certain embodiments, monitoring the movement/activity metrics of a patient that is particularly weak and unable to move independently may prevent asphyxiation, which may occur if the patient accidentally turns over so as to lie face-down. In this situation, the system 500 is configured to notify health care staff via, for example, user terminal 508 if movement/activity is detected. In some embodiments, user terminal 508 may be a nurses' station and is also communicatively coupled with other devices via the network 127, such as computer system 119, database 129, and/or other nurses' stations at the facility.

Since sensors 123 may be configured to monitor the movement/activity of a particular person wearing the sensors, in some embodiments the sensors 123 are equipped to detect if they are removed from the person. By detecting the removal of the sensors 123, the accuracy of the monitored movement/activity data can be determined, any anomalous activity can be detected, and appropriate actions can be taken. For example, if sensors 123 worn by an employee or an elderly individual are removed at some point during the day, the movement/activity data measured by the sensors 123 after the removal will not reflect the actual activity or movement of the employee or the elderly person. Besides the problem associated with collecting inaccurate data, this can be particularly problematic, because activity that could lead to an insurance discount or to a more accurate diagnosis/treatment regime may not be appropriately tracked. Thus, the sensors 123 may be configured to detect its removal from the relevant person, and to notify appropriate monitoring personnel and/or to log the removal in local or remote memory.

FIGS. 6A-D depict various views of a wearable sensor 600, similar to worn sensors 123 described in FIGS. 1 and 5, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. Wearable sensor 600 is configured to detect its removal from a person wearing it. Wearable sensor 600 includes a sensor body or housing 602 attached to a mechanical fastener. The mechanical fastener includes clip arm 604 and hinge 606, which attaches the clip arm 604 to the sensor body/housing 602. The clip arm 604, hinge 606, and sensor body/housing 602 are configured to fasten the wearable sensor 600 to a belt or some other article of clothing worn by a monitored individual. FIG. 6A depicts a side view of the wearable sensor 600 when the mechanical fastener is in a closed, fastened position. In the fastened position, electrical contacts 608 form an electrical short, detectable via detection circuitry embedded within the sensor body/housing 602 and/or within the clip arm 604. For the sensor 600 to be removed from a monitored individual, it will be necessary to open the mechanical fastener. When the mechanical fastener is opened, it will assume the configuration shown in FIG. 6B, where the electrical contacts 608 no longer form an electrical short, and instead form an electrical open circuit. The detection circuit detects this open circuit, and can take appropriate action, such as warning the monitored individual, logging the time at which the break in the circuit occurred, and/or notifying monitoring personnel that a circuit break has occurred. FIGS. 6C-D show back views of the wearable sensor 600, showing the sensor body/housing 602, the clip arm 604, the hinge 606, and the electrical contacts 608.

In some embodiments, the electrical contacts 608 may be located within the hinge 606, or elsewhere between the clip arm 604 and the sensor body 602, as long as it is able to detect a change in the position of the clip arm 604 and the sensor body 602 indicative of a release of the fastening mechanism. In certain embodiments, other contact detection and/or mechanical methods may be used, in addition to or in place of the body/hinge/arm fastener and electrical contacts 608. For example, physical connectors such as bands, tapes, or strips may be used to fasten the wearable sensor 600 to an individual. These physical connectors can be configured to detect ruptures in the connectors, for example via embedded conductive wires. Optionally, magnetic sensors may be used to detect if sensor 700 is removed, for example by detecting changes in magnetic field.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart of exemplary steps in a method for evaluating and improving workplace safety. The method begins with collecting data from sensors located at the workplace of an insured customer (step 701). The sensor data is related to employee safety. As previously described, sensors at the workplace measure environmental factors such as temperature, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, smoke, pressure, and another factors that may affect the safety of the workplace. Sensors may also be worn by employees to collect information on employee actions. Such sensors may include pressure sensors embedded in shoes, and measure lifting behavior and weight distribution of the wearer while he performs certain acts on the job, such as lifting heavy objects. Employee actions such as running, throwing, reaching, falling, and material handling can also be measured. Other types of sensors include digital cameras, weight/forces pads on the ground, infrared motion sensors, and RFID transponders on equipment, protective clothing, and employee identification cards. Systems in which these sensors are used are described above in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4.

The sensor data may be collected by mobile computing devices, such as laptops, smart phones, and PDAs, and data may be transmitted via a wireless communication protocol, such as Bluetooth® or WiFi. Sensor data may also be collected on a local computer or server.

In addition to sensor data, static data is collected at step 705. Static data may include personal information on employees, such as their medical history, level of physical fitness, job description, level of restricted access, and their current safety evaluation. Static data may also include data on objects and equipment at the workplace, such as the ergonomics (size, shape, dimensions, weight) of objects that are handled by employees, operation procedures of certain equipment, and the degree of hazard of certain work zones. In general, static data encompasses any relevant data that is not being collected in real time from sensors, including industry standards from NIOSH and OSHA. Static data may be stored at a local server.

In addition to or instead of collecting data from sensors and local static data servers, data may also be purchased or obtained from a third party (step 703). The purchased data may be used to supplement the sensor data or may be used to validate or debug the system. The purchased data may include sensor data as well as static data.

Whether the safety data is derived from sensors, a static database, or from a third party, it is analyzed, processed, and aggregated at step 707. Data may be aggregated over all the employees or it may be aggregated over a particular time interval. In some embodiments, the aggregated data are generated into reports, which can then be provided to interested parties (see step 711 below).

Data processing includes applying algorithms to the collected data, which may be in its raw form, to obtain values of interest. For example, raw sensor data may be noise filtered.

In some embodiments, the raw sensor data, processed data, and static data are combined at this step and analyzed to obtain a safety evaluation of the workplace. The evaluation may be a score or a qualitative description. The evaluation may be compared to NIOSH and OSHA safety standards to obtain a pass/fail or a good/bad characterization.

Using the safety evaluation, the insured company may institute policies to promote safe practices at step 709. For example, the insured company may offer bonuses to employees who obtain a good safety evaluation or who are willing to participate in the evaluation program. The insured company may also hold training programs to teach remedial safety practices, such as proper lifting techniques, to those determined by the evaluation system to exhibit unsafe practices. Other policies instituted by the insured company include employer recognition programs that publicly recognize employees identified by the system as safe employees, and stricter suspension or other punitive policies for employees who do not comply with the safety rules as determined by the system.

In response to insured company instituting the above mentioned policies, or other policies designed to promote a safe working environment, the insurance company can favorably alter the terms of the insurance policy, such as decreasing the premium or deductible.

At step 711, safety evaluations, in the form of reports for the entire company, individual customer facilities, employee teams, or individual employees may be provided to the company or individual as feedback. For example, a manager may receive a report indicating that a particular employee was not compliant with safety rules a certain percentage of time. The manager may relay that information to the employee verbally. A more direct form of feedback would be when the system automatically alerts an employee of an unsafe act via a real-time physical stimulus, such as a buzzer. Either way, the employee receives feedback about his actions and can correct them in the future.

At step 713, the insured company notifies the insurance company about the policies that they have instituted to promote safe behavior. Based on this alone, and without receiving the actual data, insurance company may grant discounts to the insured company at step 717.

Alternatively, the insured company may transmit the actual data to the insurance company at step 715. In this case, the insurance company may perform its own safety evaluation of the data and grant discounts based on the evaluation outcomes at step 719. The insurance company or the insured company may also hire a third party service to perform the evaluation.

In deciding to alter the terms of the insurance policy, the insurance company, or the third party evaluator, may compare the safety performance, as determined from the sensor data, of the insured company to an industry baseline. If the safety performance of the insured company is better than the industry baseline, the insurance company then alters the terms of the policy favorably.

In another scenario, the safety performance of the insured company is compared to its previous performance. For example, if the safety performance of the company improves over its past performance, then the insurance company may award discounts in the premium.

This safety evaluation and feedback system may operate continuously or at certain intervals. The process may repeat itself and lead to new adjustments in insurance policy terms and new feedback may be provided to the employees and the company. A sensor enhanced evaluation system is advantageous because it allows safety improvements at the insured company to be reflected in the policy on a more immediate time basis.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart depicting a process 800 for providing recommendations and/or insurance adjustments based on collected sensor data, according to one embodiment of the invention. Process 800 may be used in healthcare environments as described in FIG. 5, and/or in workplace environments as described in FIG. 1, to monitor injured employees that are recovering.

In step 802, movement/activity data is collected from sensors worn on the body of an employee, worker, or patient, such as sensors 123 (FIGS. 1, 5). In some embodiments, the data are collected and/or analyzed by an activity evaluation module, similar to the safety evaluation module discussed above in relation to FIG. 1. In some embodiments, the activity evaluation module collects raw data directly from the sensors 123. Optionally, the raw data from the sensors 123 is preprocessed before being provided to the activity evaluation module, either by the sensors 123 themselves or another preprocessing device. The movement/activity data may include data indicative of horizontal and/or vertical body position, turning and/or twisting of the body, or sitting/standing postures.

In step 804, the collected sensor data is then filtered to remove unwanted noise, for example via a low-pass filter, and then stored in persistent data storage such as database 129 or data storage 104 (FIGS. 1, 5). Activity metrics or other parameters indicative of movement and activity, such as body movement, body orientation, frequency of movement, duration of movement, movement distance, and calories expended, may then be calculated and used to provide an activity or recovery evaluation in step 806. For example, body movement and orientation over time can be determined with data collected from one or more 3-axis accelerometers. In some embodiments, sensor data may be coupled with user demographic information such as height, age, weight, and/or stride length to estimate a user's activity level.

In one embodiment, the body position/orientation of a user such as an employee or a patient may be determined by calculating the angle of the body on three axes—X, Y, and Z. To calculate the body angle, the worn sensors are first calibrated based on their attachment point(s) to the user's body. A first baseline angle is then determined with the user in a predetermined posture, such as lying down or standing up. This first baseline angle is then stored, and may be compared with other angle measurements taken over time. In one embodiment, the angle measurements are made with one or more 3-axis accelerometers, and may be augmented with data from additional sensors such as gyroscopes, which measure the rotation about one or more axes. For example, in an embodiment with an analog accelerometer and a 10-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC), the following calculations is used to measure user body angle:

1. Capture the output from the three channels of the accelerometer and express as a number from 1-1023. 2. Convert the output into voltage values for each axis:

VoltsRx=adcRx*Vref/1023,  a.

VoltsRy=adcRy*Vref/1023,  b.

VoltsRz=adcRz*Vref/1023,  c.

-   -   where Vref is the reference voltage for the accelerometer.         3. Calculate the signed voltage value by determining the shift         from zero acceleration:

deltaVoltsRx=VoltsRx−VzeroG,  a.

deltaVoltsRy=VoltsRy−VzeroG,  b.

deltaVoltsRz=VoltsRz−VzeroG,  c.

-   -   where VzeroG is the voltage at zero acceleration for the         accelerometer.         4. Calculate the angle:

Axr−arccos(Rx/R)  a.

Ayr−arccos(Ry/R)  b.

Azr−arccos(Rz/R)  c.

Other movement/activity metrics may also be measured. For example, frequency of movement may be determined based on time series data measured by worn accelerometers and/or sensors. If the time series data for a particular user shows that the user experiences a series of acceleration events over time, then the number of acceleration events may be combined with measurements of time to result in a movement/activity frequency measurement. Duration of movement may be measured by performing a weighted average of measured movements/activity over time to differentiate between active and sedentary periods. Movement distance may be approximated from accelerometer data via the following calculations:

velocity final=velocity initial+acceleration*time;  1.

distance=velocity final*time−0.5*acceleration*time².  2.

In certain embodiments, data indicative of movement or activity below particular thresholds is disregarded. For example, small movements such as fidgeting or brief movements such as stretching may not be included in the determination of activity metrics. Estimated calorie expenditure, which may be indicative of activity level, may be determined as follows:

Men: C/min=(−55.0969+0.6309×heart rate+0.1988×weight+0.2017×age)/4.184(weight is in kg);

Women: C/min=(−20.4022+0.4472×heart rate+0.1263×weight+0.074×age)/4.184(weight is in kg),

where heart rate may be directly measured or estimated based on age, weight, and activity level.

After the movement/activity metrics have been measured, recommendations or insurance policy adjustments based on the metrics may be provided in step 808. For example, in a healthcare environment, monitored movement/activity metrics may be used to provide recommendations for loss-control purposes, such as patient intake decisions, as described above in relation to FIG. 5. In some embodiments, collected sensor data is used for loss control, exposure management, insurance risk evaluation, assessment, and rating, as well as underwriting and/or claims management workflows. In one embodiment, collected movement/activity metrics for patients at a healthcare facility is used to evaluate risks associated with the patients and/or the healthcare facility, and/or is used to adjust insurance policies for patients and/or the healthcare facility. For example, if sensor data for elderly patients at a healthcare facility indicates that the patient movements meet or exceed recommended movement thresholds, such as frequency and/or amount, the healthcare facility may receive a discount on its insurance. In some embodiments, collected movement/activity metrics for employees of an insured entity is used to evaluate risks associated with insuring the entity, and may be used to adjust insurance policies for employees and/or the entity. As discussed above, daily activity of workers may be directly related to their overall health and wellness, and thus inversely related to the risk of injury, diseases, or other medical conditions. Thus, high monitored activity/movement levels may be indicative of good health, and insurance parameters may be adjusted accordingly. For example, if employee sensor data indicates movement/activity levels characteristic of healthy individuals, insurance premiums for the employees and/or the entity may be reduced. In some embodiments, the sensor data may be compared and/or correlated with a stored database linking historical insurance claim data with historical movement/activity levels. The recommendations provided in step 808 may include feedback to the monitored individual. These recommendations may include suggestions for better health, such as nutrition or exercise tips. The recommendations may also include recognition for meeting movement/activity goals, encouragement if the individual is close to achieving a movement/activity goal, or suggest movement if an extended sedentary period is detected.

In some embodiments, the monitored movement/activity metrics may be used for vendor management. For example, the monitored movement/activity metrics of patients at a healthcare facility may be used to evaluate how well a particular the facility/healthcare vendor adheres to prescribed guidelines, as well as how quickly patients at that facility recover. If a particular healthcare facility/vendor consistently meets prescribed guidelines and/or is characterized by quick recovery of its patients, more injured individuals may be referred to that facility/vendor. In certain embodiments, the collected sensor data and movement/activity metrics can also be stored and used to provide proof of adherence to prescribed guidelines for use if malpractice claims are brought against a vendor and/or insurance company.

In some embodiments, the collected information is aggregated by different levels. For example, collected sensor information for a group of individuals under a group benefit/insurance policy may be aggregated so that an insurance company can evaluate the overall risk of the group. Similarly, collected sensor information for a particular healthcare facility/vendor, or even individual caregivers or groups of caregivers in a particular facility, may be aggregated to allow for risk evaluation, for example for evaluating risks associated with general liability/professional liability or medical malpractice coverage. For example, an insurance company providing professional liability insurance to a particular caregiver may aggregate and analyze movement/activity information for patients under that caregiver's supervision to evaluate the risk associated with that caregiver. In some embodiments, the determination of whether a particular insurance policy is to be renewed is based on the movement/activity information.

In some embodiments, the method for evaluating and improving workplace safety described in FIG. 7 may be modified to use sensor data collected in step 802 to evaluate and improve workplace health, assist in the return-to-work recovery of injured employees, and/or assist in loss-control of health and injury claims. For example, the sensor data may be combined with static data (step 705, FIG. 7) and/or third party data (step 703, FIG. 7) and analyzed, processed, and/or aggregated (step 707, FIG. 7) to provide activity and/or lifting evaluations. The insured entity may institute policies to promote healthy activity based on the data (or to improve patient movement frequency, for healthcare facilities) (step 709, FIG. 7), and may receive discounts or other favorable insurance policy adjustments from insurance companies providing insurance to the entity

FIG. 9 shows exemplary insurance policy terms that can be adjusted in the present system. Insurance policy 900 is characterized by terms 901-917. In response to a safety or activity evaluation of an insured entity, some of the terms 901-917 of the insurance policy are adjusted to reflect the evaluation. For example, a favorable evaluation may lead to a decrease in premium 901 and deductible amount 902. An unfavorable evaluation may lead to an increase in premium 901. The deductible credit 903, loss limit 904, excess loss premium factors 905, retrospective rating plans and factors 906, experience rating plan modifications 907, schedule rating plan credits or debits 908, dividend plan types 909, dividend plan retention factors 910, expected dividend plan payouts 911, amount of rate deviation 912, service cost expectations 913, start and end dates 914, coverage description 915, services offered 916, entity ID 917, and other policy terms may be altered in a similar manner. In some embodiments, the determination of whether to renew an insurance policy covering an insured entity is based on the evaluation. 

1. An activity evaluation system for use in managing an insurance-related process, comprising: at least one sensor configured to monitor an activity level of an individual associated with an insured entity: an activity evaluation module configured to: collect activity level-related data from the at least one sensor; analyze the collected activity level-related data to determine an activity evaluation indicative of the activity level of the individual; and output the activity evaluation; an output device configured to provide feedback that is based at least in part on the activity evaluation; and a communications module configured to communicate at least one of the collected data and the activity evaluation to a server operated by an insurance company providing insurance to the entity.
 2. The system of claim 1, comprising a business logic processor configured to adjust an insurance-related parameter associated with the entity based on at least one of the collected data and the activity evaluation.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein adjusting an insurance-related parameter comprises adjusting a term of an insurance policy covering the insured entity, and adjusting the term comprises adjusting at least one of a premium, a deductible, a limit, services associated with the insurance policy, costs of the services, rating plan parameters, and dividend plan parameters based on at least one of the collected data and the activity evaluation.
 4. The system of claim 2, wherein adjusting an insurance-related parameter comprises adjusting a renewal decision of an insurance policy covering the insured entity based on at least one of the collected data and the activity evaluation.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor is worn by the individual, and is configured to provide a notification if the at least one sensor is removed from the individual.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the output device provides real-time feedback to at least one of the individual and the insured entity, the feedback comprises at least one of a visual, audio, or tactile stimulus.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the individual is an employee of the insured entity, the at least one sensor is worn by the employee, and the activity level is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the employee.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the individual is an elderly person, the at least one sensor is worn by the elderly person, and the activity level is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the elderly person.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the feedback is a treatment regimen recommendation for the elderly person.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the output device provides feedback to a caregiver associated with the insured entity.
 11. An activity evaluation system for use in managing an insurance-related process, comprising: a server configured to receive activity evaluation data derived at least in part from at least one sensor monitoring the activity of an individual associated with an insured entity; and a business logic processor configured to adjust an insurance-related parameter associated with the insured entity based at least in part on an analysis of the received data by an activity evaluation module.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the analysis of the received data comprises calculating a correlation between the activity evaluation data and an insurance risk.
 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the business logic processor is configured to adjust an insurance related parameter by adjusting a term of an insurance policy covering the insured entity based on the activity evaluation, and wherein adjusting the term comprises adjusting at least one of a premium, a deductible, a limit, services associated with the insurance policy, costs of the services, rating plan parameters, and dividend plan parameters.
 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the business logic processor is configured to adjust an insurance-related parameter by adjusting a renewal decision of an insurance policy covering the insured entity.
 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the individual is an employee of the insured entity, the at least one sensor is worn by the employee, and the activity evaluation data is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the employee.
 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the individual is an elderly person, the at least one sensor is worn by the elderly person, and the activity evaluation data is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the elderly person.
 17. A method for evaluating activity for use in managing an insurance-related process, comprising: receiving by a server evaluation data derived at least in part from at least one sensor monitoring the activity of an individual associated with an insured entity; and adjusting by a business logic processor an insurance-related parameter associated with the insured entity based at least in part on an analysis of the received data by an activity evaluation module.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the analysis of the received data comprises calculating a correlation between the activity evaluation data and an insurance risk.
 19. The method of claim 17, wherein adjusting an insurance related parameter comprises adjusting a term of an insurance policy covering the insured entity based on the activity evaluation, and wherein adjusting the term comprises adjusting at least one of a premium, a deductible, a limit, services associated with the insurance policy, costs of the services, rating plan parameters, and dividend plan parameters.
 20. The method of claim 17, wherein adjusting an insurance-related parameter comprises adjusting a renewal decision of an insurance policy covering the insured entity.
 21. The method of claim 17, wherein the individual is an employee of the insured entity, the at least one sensor is worn by the employee, and the activity evaluation data is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the employee.
 22. The method of claim 17, wherein the individual is an elderly person, the at least one sensor is worn by the elderly person, and the activity evaluation data is at least partially representative of the physical activity of the elderly person. 